System and method for dynamic price setting and facilitation of commercial transactions

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides methods and systems for defining commercial transaction components; defining rules for mapping customer transactions into individual components; market segmentation in light of these individual definitions and bundling individual components of an offer into optimized packages for presentation and sale. A data processing system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, examines the commercial behavior of enrolled customers, breaks each of the constituent transactions into purchases of atom-level components; catalogues those components; extracts demographic information from said transactions and other sources; facilitates demographic studies of groups of such customers; optimizes offerings to such groups; and facilitates the consummation of those offers of sale. The processing system may also facilitate customers fiscal management through the communication of data necessary to practice the instant invention.

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.10/935,728 filed Sept. 7, 2004 now abandoned; which is a continuation ofU.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/714,853 filed Nov. 15, 2000, whichclaims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos.60/180,363 filed Feb. 4, 2000 and 60/203,183 filed May 8, 2000, all ofwhich are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to a method and system for moreefficiently matching desired goods and services and offer terms forthose goods and services to willing consumers to facilitate commercialtransactions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Traditional Marketing

The marketing of goods and services to consumers has always been moreart than science, and the science aspect has been rather inexact. Theinexactness of the science derives primarily from the fact that vendorsare unable to obtain, at least without prohibitive cost, sufficientlyaccurate information concerning consumer's actual preferences, eitherindividually, or in the aggregate. The vendor's strategy forascertaining aggregated consumer preference data is, presently, toconcentrate on segments of the consumer market, but they are only ableto isolate or define these segments at a prohibitively high cost.

The vendor's study of segments of the consumer market allows a vendor tostudy the behavior of the whole of the market by studying the behaviorof each of a number of smaller groups of consumers in the market (marketsegments) and aggregating the behavior over all of the groups. The keyto such segmentation, however, is the selection of the factors used todetermine which consumer is in which group. Each factor selected must berelated to the predicted behavior in order for the segmentation to beeffective.

Generally, the factors the vendor selects to define a market segment arebased upon demographic data which is costly to compile. The principalmethods of compiling demographic data have been surveys and census data.Because census data is typically derived by extensive survey, themethods are essentially survey-based.

The survey method of obtaining market segment data typically consists ofposing a number of questions of two types. The first type of question isfor ascertaining the demographics of the surveyed consumer. The secondtype of question is for ascertaining the consumer's purchasing behaviorwith regard to the relevant product. Once the survey is complete, thevendor is able to define a proposed segment of the market based upon theconsumers' answers to the two types of questions and then validate thatsegment by testing its response to product offerings. For instance, thevendor's market researchers might study all of the consumers who aremale, married, of European ancestry, and in the group from 40 to 45years of age, in order to determine their motor oil purchasing habits.These purchasing habits are then associated with those demographicfactors, are studied for degree of correlation. If the degree ofcorrelation is sufficiently high, a cause and effect relation betweenthe factors and the admitted behavior is presumed.

This presumption is then extrapolated from the survey sample, to theentire demographic. In other words, the survey assumes that behavior ofa small group of consumers that the vendor randomly selects and whoshare a demographic factor is the same as the whole group of consumerssharing that same demographic factor. In practice, these assumptionsgenerally prove to be reliable enough to justify the cost of the survey,but all too often, just barely justified. Knowing, for instance, thatmost members of a constructed demographic group, (or “market segment”)report the purchase of a particular product will not justify a vendor inpresuming the same purchase by each member of that group.

Another method of studying segments of a market is the focus group. Inthis method, the vendor selects a number of demographic factors todefine a group. The vendor then recruits consumer members of thisdemographic group and presents them with the relevant product. Theirreactions to the relevant product are again assumed to be the reactionsof the whole of the market segment that share these demographic factors.

Each method relies upon constructing a model of the segment of themarketplace, and from that model extrapolating the behavior of themarket. If either the model is flawed or the group's behavior does notaccurately reflect the market place, the resulting impressions of themarketplace are misleading.

Even once they have targeted an audience; vendors then must spend atremendous amount of money to deploy the marketing plan. Specifically,even vendors who are equipped with reliable demographic factors likelyto yield a sale, the vendor then must identify and locate whichconsumers share these demographic factors and thus belong within thatsegment. For example, if a bicycle manufacturer has learned that 25-45year old, college educated, white males are more likely to buy mountainbikes costing over $900 than any other market segment, it is notpossible to immediately offer such bikes to all those, and only those inthat segment, because it is not possible to accurately and preciselyidentify them. Thus, defining a segment to target is one thing; hittingthe target is quite another. A well-known example of this problem isdirect mail from vendors to “potential” customers which is so routinelydiscarded that it is known as “junk mail. For the foregoing reasons,while current marketing does work, and products are sold, the process isextremely inefficient.

Most in marketing would admit to the existence of a sort of “UncertaintyPrinciple;” that the very act of observation will shift the outcome.Even when queried for information about their spending habits, consumersmay consciously or subconsciously report information they believe thesurveyor wishes to hear or information that makes them appear moreappealing than would their purely truthful answers. For instance, fewconsumers would readily admit to purchasing large quantities of fattyfoods. Yet, actual sales studies suggest otherwise. Even moreimportantly, most consumers believe they have certain preferences orspending habits but they are simply honestly mistaken. This kind ofmistake is prevalent with recurring, but small and variable expensessuch as groceries and phone charges.

Another problem with traditional market research is that the informationgathered has a limited shelf life. Consumers often present a movingtarget to vendors. What is in vogue one day may well evaporate the next.Thus, even if consumers could perfectly self-report in a vendor's study,the results of that study provide only a “snapshot” valid only at themoment taken. Therefore, even the time required to compile the resultsof such a snapshot tends to diminish its value.

If the uncertainty in targeting a potential consumer could be eliminatedby better knowledge of each consumer's actual buying habits, the knownmarketing techniques of market segmentation would assure more successfulmarketing. Rather than conducting surveys, or trying to guess the buyingpatterns of consumers or to trust their responses to surveys, vendorsrequire a “window” into the actual buying habits of their market. In awell-observed market, such a window would be both accurate and dynamicthereby overcoming the principal shortcomings of current market study.

In summary, the principal short comings of market segmentation studiesas currently practiced generally arise from three fundamentaldefects: 1) the approximation of the whole by smaller defined groups,sometimes referred to as sampling or extrapolation error; 2) lag time;and 3) the definition of the group and its behavior based solely uponthe consumer's self reporting. Due to inconsistencies in andunreliability of self-reporting, the data is less scientific than thatallowed by other “direct observation” disciplines. These fundamentalproblems are part of what the present invention solves.

Intermediary Marketing

What has been lacking is a promontory from which to view actual,objective, nearly contemporaneous, individual consumer purchaseactivity. If the actual purchasing practices and transactions of theiractual and potential customers were known to vendors, vendors would beable to more accurately ascertaining segment or segments of the marketto which the vendor's products would appeal, and to target their offersprecisely to that segment. The buying habits and actual transaction dataof all potential customer segments are nowhere comprehensively,aggregated or compiled in an accessible form, by either consumers orvendors. And, because individual vendors are generally unwilling andunable (due to differences in compiling such data and other reasons) toshare what data they have as to the behavior of particular consumers, amore precise study is not likely to arise from vendor records.

Because neither end of the sale/purchase transaction will serve as asource of reliable market information, the answer must rest in themiddle, i.e. with an intermediary. The only place to interpose such anintermediary is between the unreliable reporting of consumers andunavailable and incomplete data compiled by vendors. Between vendors andconsumers there exists a well spring of purchase information containedin consumer bills.

The vast majority of consumer purchases leave a “paper trail” reflectingthe exchange of goods or services for money. While cash sales do exist,the predominant method of purchase is, of necessity, some form ofbilling relationship. Especially in the fields of periodically purchasedproducts such as telephone services or insurance, the billing componentof the relationship tells a great deal about the actual purchasinghabits of the customer.

Consider the traditional bill-paying model. Periodically, generallymonthly, a consumer will pay bills to various utilities, vendors, creditcard companies, and, perhaps, a mortgage holder. These payments are inresponse to bills mailed to the consumer. In this series oftransactions, there exists a great deal of information that would beinvaluable to the various vendors as to the consumer's preferences, andmore importantly, willingness to spend money for various features andunwillingness to do so for others.

Should an intermediary be placed between the customer and the vendorswhen the vendors distribute their bills, the customer purchases of goodsand services could be carefully tracked and stored for further analysis.As consumers are typically creatures of habit, what they do with theirfunds one month (at least in terms of categories of recurring expenses)they will likely do the next month and the next month.

The instant invention relates to the utilization of an intermediarybetween the consumer and the vendors to “read” the consumers' bills. Anadvantage of such an intermediary is that all of the consumers'transactions are “seen” by the intermediary. These transactions, whetherby direct billing or by credit card, accurately and objectively conveythe purchase habits of the consumers. The actual executed transactionsby consumers reveal objective, and thus very valuable information aboutconsumers, both individually, and in the aggregate.

If, either by means of electronic transfers of funds to pay monthlybills or by cataloguing the contents of bills, the intermediary wouldhave access to the consumer's purchase patterns and habits data, and ifthat data were analyzed, vendors would be able to target their marketingmuch more effectively. Specifically, vendors' market segmentation wouldbe derived from actual transaction data rather than subjectivepreferences prone to sampling and perception error. Vendors would beable to more precisely and accurately segment the market. In this way,consumers would be presented offers and terms with a much higherprobability of being acceptable. Overall, the marketing goods andservices with consumers would be more efficient.

Moreover, in the present invention, purchase habit information derivedfrom transaction data can then be correlated with those same consumers'demographic information. Such demographic information can be obtaineddirectly from the consumer, by traditional methods, or, to a limited butsubstantial extent, derived from the transaction data itself.

Regardless of how the demographic data is obtained, it is correlatedagainst actual, objective transaction data. Thus, at its heart, theinvention enables vendors to know exactly who, in terms of demographics,is buying what, and on what terms. Equipped with this knowledge, thevendors can sell and the purchasers buy goods taking advantage of thelower prices that result from increased efficiency in the process.

The efficiencies and advantages are not only for the benefit of thevendors, but also for the benefit of consumers. Specifically, as themarketing process becomes more accurate and precise in targeting willingconsumers via the present invention, consumers in turn will tend toreceive only those offers which have a high likelihood of meeting theirneeds. Hence, there will be less “junk mail,” in whatever medium.Second, as mentioned, prices will be lower. Third, transaction “search”costs (that is, the time and hassle involved in “shopping” for moreappropriate offers) will be substantially reduced. Fourth, the inventionwill permit the vendors to offer goods and services upon terms which,due to the described inefficiencies, were previously not available onthe market at all. Put differently, the process known in economics as“price searching” will be simultaneously less expensive and moreaccurate, enabling vendors to create offers hitherto unavailable. Fifth,the present invention effects these advantages without involving morework for the consumers. Consumers simply must pay their bills as perusual, and that very process becomes the primary source of the raw datafrom which the present invention derives its improved information, andconsequent efficiencies. Sixth, the invention ultimately reducesconsumers' expenses, not only by reducing prices, but by making it morelikely that the consumer is purchasing those combinations of goods andservices and terms which are most appropriate, that is, most closelytrack, that consumers' demands.

In effect, the invention eliminates, or at least reduces, paying forgoods or services that the consumers neither want nor need, but havehitherto been required to purchase as part of a package with goods andservices the consumer does want and/or need.

The banking industry has presented one example of a limitedintermediary. Consumers, as taught in Motoyama, U.S. Pat. No. 5,913,202,purchase mortgages and investment instruments from a plurality of banks.In order to interact with the intermediary, the consumer must registerand in the act of registering, provide the intermediary with informationas to subjective preferences in banking services and in financialproducts. A banking intermediary, which acts as a clearinghouse forthese services or financial products, compiles offers that meet theconsumers stated preferences and presents them to the consumer.

Motoyama falls short of the advantages of the instant invention. First,the products and services the Motoyama invention presents to theconsumer are selected on the basis of easily distinguishable attributes.For instance, interest rates, term, principal, etc., on loan instrumentsare numerically described attributes and hence easily categorized andcompared. Throughout practice, the invention gains no greater insightinto the consumer than the consumer himself was willing or able todescribe in enrolling. Motoyama also fails to teach collectinginformation from one's household bills and using that information tofind the most suitable product or offer terms. The instant invention isdistinct from Motoyama in that the instant invention matches customersto products by utilizing and analyzing the consumer's own purchasehistory.

Peckover, U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,101, also recognizes the potential of asystem of matching consumers with vendors. Specifically, Peckoverteaches a system for electronic commerce having personal agents(computer programs with the ability to perform tasks) that representconsumers and providers in a virtual marketplace, such as is presentedon the Internet. The consumer sends the specifications of the productdesired out into the virtual marketplace. These consumer personal agentscreate decision agents that shop for products and return the results tothe consumer. The consumer software agent works as a sophisticatedsearch engine that further assists consumers in comparing and rankingthe found products. Among the shortcomings of Peckover is its inabilityof deriving and/or validating the consumers' preferences from theirpurchase history.

In contrast, the instant invention allows far greater precision in boththe search for and in the recording of the purchasing of goods. Theinstant invention has the ability to create a complete marketplace andin doing so, catalogues and describes with a precision that is notavailable with the system of agents Peckover describes. With eachpurchase, the customer of the instant invention reveals more of hislikes and dislikes. The Peckover invention has no ability to deduceand/or project the needs of the customer from the customers actualtransactions.

Instead, Peckover relies only on the history of customers' searches. Bytracking and reviewing customers' search history, the Peckover inventionis able to inform vendors of the wants of consumers. Because it isneither comprehensive, i.e. contains all of consumer's purchasepatterns, nor does it catalogue the terms of the purchases, there islittle data to extend the information beyond that garnered by followinga shopper as that shopper window shops. The instant invention, on theother hand, learns about the customer's likes and dislikes by watchingall of the purchase decisions, and the terms of the actual transactions.Furthermore, unlike Peckover, the instant invention actively compilesdemographic information about the customer and constantly correlates itagainst the pattern of purchases contained in its customer database.Because each of these purchases is defined by the identity of theproduct purchased, tiny distinctions between competing and virtuallyidentical products reveal the customer's likes and dislikes right downto “label affinity.” After compiling such data and examining that datain light of the customer demographics, the instant invention can predictbehavior for groups of consumers.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The object of this invention is to interpose a Data Processing System(“DPS”) between the consumer and vendors, and in light of theinformation garnered by direct observation of consumer buying habits,unite vendors and likely consumers for the sale of goods and services.The DPS may stand-alone or might be hosted by a consumer bank, a creditcard issuer, a debit card bank or an intermediary electronic bill payingservice with access to some or all of the customer's account ortransaction data. The only requirement is that the DPS is positioned,directly or indirectly, to analyze some or all of the customer's billsor bill payment transaction data.

The instant invention can be practiced in a “stand alone” mode asdescribed. A more advantageous mode of practice of the invention occurswhen the entity in control of the DPS “partners” with a portal or dataaggregator at which a consumer's bill paying activity transaction datais aggregated in electronic form. Such portals or data aggregators aresometimes referred to as Consumer Service Organizations (or “CSO”) Oneexample of a CSO is a consumer banking institution.

Such a partnering would allow electronic bill paying once the entitypresents the bills to the consumer. In such an embodiment, the customerwould receive the bills from the various vendors through, or inconnection with, the CSO. (In some cases the CSO itself could be incontrol of the DPS, rather than in commercial partnership with aseparate DPS entity). Upon reviewing such bills, the customer woulddesignate an account from which a bill is to be paid and direct payment.After that payment, the CSO would then pass the payment transaction datato the entity in control of the DPS. The entity in control of the DPSwould then, on behalf of the consumers and vendors, present and paybills in an integrated environment. Alternately, the DPS would simplyhave electronic access to the stream of transaction data generated bythe electronic bill presentment and payment mechanism.

While such integration is not a necessary feature of the invention, whenpracticed with the invention, it greatly enhances its efficiency andassures greater customer acceptance of the invention. Additionalbenefits of a transaction database tied to a bill paying and/orpresentment engine or related process (a CSO, or other such dataaggregator, such as, for example, for electronic bill presentment andpayment: cyberbills.com, paymybills.com, yodlee.com) include thecustomer's ability to budget with a precision that has not beenpreviously available. Because each expense is broken down into itscomponent parts, consumers may budget by exactly the number of unitsrequired. Such a system is more completely described in our otherProvisional Application No. 60/249,232, “SYSTEM FOR DYNAMICALLY DERIVINGOPTIMAL TRANSACTION TERMS FROM AGGREGATED CONSUMER TRANSACTION PROFILEDATA (3).

By allowing the DPS to serve as the customer's post box for bills, or toread the transaction data stream from the electronic bill paymentprocess, the records the DPS compiles would yield great insight intoconsumer's true buying habits. Augmenting the traditional methods ofdeveloping demographic data (surveying, census data, and data compiledby consumer credit reporting agencies), the analysis of bills ascertainswith precision and accuracy, the buying habits of a particular customerand, in turn, for a complete market of customers. Each bill containsdetails specific to the usage of a product by a specific consumer. Theinventive system, then, studies the line item details in the bills inorder to determine the extent to which the consumer purchases aparticular product within a given time period, and upon what terms.

To effect the analysis of these purchases, the DPS develops acomprehensive and precise catalogue of goods and services, a TransactionDatabase. This database “learns” new offers by comparing them toexisting line items it “knows” and when such a good or service isdistinct from those known, the system assigns a statistical “name” tothe good or service, such “name” to reflect similarity, where suchexists to “known” goods or services.

Controlling software or controllers exist within the DPS which sort andcategorize these goods and services such that like goods and servicesare associated with like. Definitions of new line item products arecompared and contrasted with those existing within the database, and asa result of that comparison, both the existing and the new productdefinition might be refined. For instance, the existing definition of a35 mm still camera might be modified when the same manufacturer offersthe still camera with an auto-focus feature. As a result, thetransaction database catalogue contains distinct but largely similardefinitions of both the auto-focus and the non-auto-focus instances ofthe product.

Before goods or services transactions are entered into the database,each goods or service line item is dissected into all of its constituentor elemental parts. As with, for example, insurance, various coveragesare offered at particular prices. The whole product consists of a bundleof the coverages. For the purposes of the DPS, these coverages must eachbe separately defined. The bundle of these coverages is thenreconstructed into the product offering. The idea is to arrive at basiccomponent definitions derived from commercial compound transactions.

The analysis engine dissects or reduces a purchase into its most“elemental” components in order to capture the total economic effect ofthe purchase. Additionally, the analysis engine weighs the elements ofeach purchase in order to optimize potential purchases. What would savethe consumer money?

Vendor's rules and, in some cases, the law, require additionalcompounding or “bundling” of these purchases. The components of apurchase may include fixed recurring costs, fixed one time costs,variable costs, and incentives.

For instance, federal, state, and local taxes attach to most sales andare a mandatory part of the bundle, in spite of the fact that thesetaxes add no value to the bundle of rights purchased. Similarly, atelephone bill may include, not only the fixed price of monthly service,but also such charges as a one-time “hook-up” charge and various set upfees that are necessary adjuncts to providing services on a monthlybasis. In sum, the contract to provide a service is, generally, acontract to provide a group of products.

In the absurd extreme, failure to recognize this fact of bundling wouldallow two long distance telephone service offers to stand as equals evenif one required a million dollar “set-up” fee. Such offers would not beequal in the eyes of the purchasing consumer. In analysis of a number ofpurchase candidates for a particular consumer, the analysis enginebreaks the potential purchase into discrete and comparable elements.

For a product or a service, the elements of the purchase may beidentical between several vendors. In the simplest instance, where twocompetitors sell the same television under the same tax and deliveryrules, the less expensive set should represent the better purchase forthe consumer.

All economic factors yield to such analysis. If, for instance, the salestax that attaches to a purchase from one vendor does not attach to thatof another vendor, the second vendor's offering should be the betterpurchase in the eyes of the consumer; the analysis engines seeks tosimilarly score the purchase.

Non-economic factors play a part in shopping as well. When the consumerseeks to deal with a burst pipe, a three-week delivery lag woulddisqualify even the cheapest of mops, or more likely, restorationcontractors. The analysis engine must score such non-economic factors asdelivery time to mirror consumer shopping. As the example suggests,non-economic factors weight the purchase price rather than to add orsubtract from it. The price of the product is multiplied by a factorcorresponding to the speed with which the vendor can meet the need ofthe consumer. The weighting need not be “straight line.” In the earlierexample, having the mop or restoration contractor services within hoursof the burst makes the mop or services very valuable; having it on thesecond rather than the third day after the burst should decrease therelative value.

From product to product and factor to factor, the weighing protocol willvary. Vast data available due to the many consumers and the many billsfor each consumer, will allow the analysis engine to developcomprehensive weighting factors and scales for every product within theDPS and associate those factors in the analysis. In an example of acellular telephone, the analysis engine would consider the fixed,monthly, costs and multiply them by a factor derived from coverageratings (perhaps those from J. D. Powers or other such rating sources),thereby scoring the competing services, for comparison.

Known sources and weighting for rating families of products exist.Journals publish such ratings regularly; Consumer Reports rates numerousproducts as do journals unique to fields such as PC Magazine forcomputing and Runners' World for running shoes. Where a truly uniqueproduct comes into existence, studies by known methods described aboveas marketing techniques can be used to derive the weighting scales.

As the experience base grows, the analysis engine continues to check theweighting scales against the experience base in order to refine theweighting. The factors should predict consumer choices and where theanalysis engine finds a variance, it increments the weighting factor andre-runs the analysis. In time, this loop should assure further andfurther refinement until the analysis engine can accurately predict eachtransaction.

Once these bundles are analyzed; the system catalogues the data derivedfrom these bills in the Customer Database, then “recompiles” or returnsthe read and analyzed bills, and transmits them in electronic form tothe customer. Simultaneously, the fact of the purchase is stored in theCustomer Database. As the amount of information in the Customer, Vendorand Transaction Databases grows, the demographic information about eachconsumer becomes more comprehensive. As the data set becomes morecomprehensive, the quality of the inferences to be drawn from the dataincreases. Each bill conveys and refines the picture of the customer.Each elemental transaction provides clues as to who purchases anindividual good or service.

When compared against known demographic data for the customer (derived,as earlier stated, by customer interviews and third party reportingagencies, or even from analysis of pre-existing transaction data), eachpurchase leaves a benchmark for gauging actual, and projecting futuremarket penetration. For instance, when a middle-aged male head ofhousehold, earning in excess of one-hundred-thousand-dollars, and ofEuropean descent purchased Valvoline™ motor oil, recording the eventrefines the database.

Aggregate this single record of purchase, across the many purchases in abilling cycle and then across the many purchasing customers, and theinventive system has created an observable, and analyzablemicro-economy.

That is, that “micro-economy” in fact previously existed within thelarger economy, but it was previously not isolated, and hence notmeaningfully observable or amenable to analysis. The DPS analyzes thesepurchases over time. The system contains a library of known forecastingmethods and by iterative analysis of the data, determines which methodproduces the most accurate forecast for a given consumer by bothapplying the history of the consumers past behavior and analyzing thehabits of groups of demographically similar consumers. This forecastingmethod is then used to predict consumer behavior for the next timeperiod. Risk analysis is applied to the forecast to minimize theeconomic effect if the forecast varies from the actual usage.

Once the catalogue of products and services (Transaction Database) isfunctionally operable, having a minimum amount of data necessary foranalysis, the system is able to predict the behavior of the marketdefined by customers contained within the Customer Database. At thisphase the inventive function includes a method and system for providingan offer, which of all available offers, is the best available offer fora given consumer. Offers are collected from one or more vendors andstored in an offer repository (Vendor Database). The system analyzesthese offers in light of the predicted behavior of its customers. Ineach instance, the offer is ranked according the particular marketsegment which has shown the greatest market penetration in their pastbehavior.

Each component of the offer is then analyzed by iterations to optimizemarket segmentation. To achieve optimization, the system deems severalknown demographic factors to be relevant of those known factors. Themarket is segmented by such factors and market penetration is gauged foreach segment. The results are recorded. The system then varies thefactors and, again, gauges the impact. Once that segmentation of themarket that produces the greatest market penetration in several of thesegments is found, those demographic factors that produced suchpenetration are deemed relevant.

Now the offer is transmitted to all customers likely to purchase thatgood or service within each segment. Along with the bare offer, thesystem sends an projection (typically annualized) of the cost of such agood or service based upon the consumer's own prior use. Additionally,the system attaches those mandatory components appropriate for “realworld” comparison. In alternate embodiments, the system can send severalcompeting offers with the same annualized projection. The consumer thenselects the offer that represents the best value.

Segments are created and allocated dynamically as new offers arereceived. The computing capability available at moderate prices, allowsthe constant computation and re-computation of offers. Offers thatpreviously met no market need are reanalyzed as offers are added to anddeleted from the system.

Just as the system refines its own knowledge of the customer's likes anddislikes through market segment iteration, the informed selections drivethe vendors of such offers to optimize those offers in terms of eithereconomies or goods or services offered. In order to be competitive inthis DPS-defined market, the offer has to be adequately competitive tomake market penetration. The cost of designing offers in thisenvironment would be substantially lower than the costs of production,design, advertising, offer management, etc. of a traditional offer sentto the real, but diffuse world.

Towards that same end, the system allows the vendor to construct abundle of goods or services in a manner to assure greater marketeconomies. For instance, should a vendor elect to sacrifice margin inorder to secure market share, that vendor can project market penetrationwith greater accuracy with the assistance of the DPS data engine. Inlight of the projection, the vendor can continue to optimize the offer,without risk, in order to assure greatest effect.

A second incentive exists for optimizing offers. The system allowsincreased consumer mobility. By facilitating the consumer's immediateand automatic move from one periodic provider of goods or services toanother, the vendor that does not change to meet the desires of themarket risks nearly immediate market isolation. Thus, the systemenvisions a very mobile market.

The mobility of the market is maximized if the transaction cost,especially search cost, for moving from one vendor to another isminimized. To accomplish this capability, the system is designed toallow the customer to define the factors for optimization and then toback away from the system. This “set and forget” mode allows the systemto optimize in the background, with no transaction costs in terms ofconsumer time or effort spent in shopping for periodic providers. Theeffect is complete, efficient and transparent coverage for the customerwith a minimum of customer effort.

In accordance with other aspects of the invention, vendors will presentoffers only to likely consumers, thereby maximizing the efficiency ofthe marketing process. Expenses associated with advertising, marketingand storefront warehousing and supply are eliminated. Focus groups arenot necessary and the vendors are not required to risk losses due totest marketing.

In accordance with still further aspects of the invention, vendors willmold offers to the demographics of available consumers and by thatmeans, more realistically project margins on sales of goods or servicesas the same are affected by volume.

In accordance with yet other aspects of the invention, vendors will beable to offer services that would be otherwise unprofitable due to themarketing necessary to reach otherwise scattered likely consumers,thereby increasing the vendor's competitive lines of goods or services.Thus, if an obscure market for a unique good should surface fromanalysis of purchasing habits, the vendor may consolidate that market,offer the obscure good and capitalize on that demand without the greatexpenditure of marketing to geographically or demographically diverseconsumers.

In accordance with still another aspect of the invention, consumer'sindividual purchase patterns are not disclosed to vendors, rather theconsumption behavior of a universe of consumers is presented, therebyallowing maximal market penetration without compromise of privatepatterns of behavior by individual consumers.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detailbelow with reference to the following drawings.

FIG. 1 illustrates the presently preferred of several embodiments of theinvention, here being marketed with a natural partner, banking services;

FIG. 2 illustrates the hardware necessary to enable this preferredembodiment through the use of a communication network;

FIG. 3 illustrates the components and interconnections of the inventioncomprises;

FIG. 4 illustrates the customer's enrollment in the system and analysisthat constantly refines the contents of the Customer Database;

FIG. 5 illustrates one hypothetical customer's aggregated paymentobligations for one billing cycle, typically, but not necessarily, onemonth;

FIG. 6 illustrates the hypothetical customer's telephone bill in twocycles and the several line items the bill comprises;

FIG. 7 illustrates the system's method of analyzing and cataloguing thebills as they are submitted;

FIG. 8 illustrates an overall schematic of the database engine forproducing best offers;

FIG. 9 illustrates the detailed flowchart of the process by which acustomer “shops” for a product using the system;

FIG. 10 illustrates the system's method for targeted marketing of anoffer by a vendor;

FIG. 11 illustrates the system's method of optimizing a vendor's offerin light of market segmentation study; and,

FIG. 12 illustrates the consumer's method of automatically starting andcanceling periodic products for efficient and seamless coverage.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

For the purpose of this application, the term software is deemed toinclude instructions as to use.

According to the principles of this invention, certain limitationsimposed by conventional pricing systems are eliminated allowing for amore fluid responsive micro-economy. A market, comprising customers ofthe inventive system (also referred to as Data Processing System or“DPS”), is observed closely in all of its purchasing activity. As aresult of the knowledge garnered in that observation, the customers canpurchase and the vendors can sell goods that comply with the customer'sneeds with great efficiency. Efficiencies in sales are realized in manyways, including the extremely competitive pricing strategies thatvendors tailor to this market.

Referring to FIG. 1, while the DPS might be used in partnership with acredit card issuer, a consumer debit card account, a credit union, anelectronic bill-paying service, or other similar service, such apartnership is not necessary. The invention can stand alone without anydiminution of its function. This FIGURE illustrates the partnering ofthe inventive system 100 with a consumer bank 200 and linked on thebank's Web page 210. Much as some customers of credit unions are alsogranted access to discount warehouse retailers of goods, customers ofbanks or other institutions might be granted enrollment in the DPS as anincentive for doing business with the bank. Because of the savingsproduced by the efficient market defined by membership in the DPS,customers might also pay for the privilege of enrollment. In eitherregard, customers require some access to the system to fully participatein the market.

Customers 10 gain access to the services of the inventive system bymeans of the Communications Network 25 portrayed in FIG. 2. Also shownare communicative links to vendors 300 and such third-party informationservices as Consumer Credit Reporting services and other sources ofthird-party demographic information which optionally may supplement thatprovided by the customer upon enrollment.

FIG. 2 illustrates the hardware connections that provide the context ofenvironment for the preferred embodiment of the invention. Theypresently preferred means of communication would be a communicationsnetwork 25 such as the Internet. As is discussed below, however, thepoint to point communications necessary to practice the invention canoccur by any communications network, as will various WAN and LANtechnologies including wired and wireless technologies or anycombination of all of the communication means. Indeed, because no nodeof the network requires real-time access, the principal CommunicationNetwork 25 can be either by telephone operators in verbal communicationover telephone lines or, as is discussed below, communication and billforwarding through courier or U.S. Postal Service. In short, it is moreimportant that communication occur than that the communication beimmediate. Speed is not the essence of the communication but such speedas the Internet supports enhances the “mobility” of the market definedby the invention.

Also portrayed in FIG. 2 are the outside sources of informationnecessary for maximum utilization of invention, along with the DPS 100.These are the customers 10; the vendors 301, 302, and 303; and the thirdparty credit reporting service 50. Also shown in this embodiment is thehost bank 200. In this diagram, the outside sources of information areelectronically connected to the DPS 100 by means of a communicationnetwork, preferably the Internet.

In FIG. 3, preferable operational components of the DPS 100 aredescribed. These include relational databases 110, 120, and 130. In theCustomer Database 110, the DPS stores Customer Data 111, i.e., allinformation from whatever source that might be useful in demographicstudies as well as all information personal to the Customer. TheCustomer Database 110 will include all credit history, all purchasehistory, responses to surveys (if any)*, and the initial listingapplication information, including the associations between vendor andcustomer for the production of bills. The Customer Database is also therepository for any obligations owing on bills from those vendors.

The Transaction Database 130 is the dictionary to the system,containing, as it does, the elemental definitions of the goods andservices described in the system. While the Vendor Database 120 willcontain the definitions of bundles of products, it will only do so asseries of these definitions. The definitions of goods will not containprices, but will define the salable unit. Additionally, the transactiondatabase will contain such tags as are necessary to indicate definitionsof persons projected to have an affinity to the product in question.These definitions are dynamic but are stored here with the product.

The Vendor Database 120 carries all Vendor Data 121. Beyondidentification data, the Vendor Database 120 will carry associations ofvendors with defined products; prices in any current offerings alongwith bundling rules associated with said offering; and any conditionsupon the delivery of relevant product.

Finally, the Customer Service Database 190 stores all requests forservice on existing transactions. Service, in this sense, means returns,stop payments and other adjustments on accounts. The Customer ServiceAgency 191 handles the calls for service and the results are stored onthe database 190. While not necessary for the practice of the invention,its inclusion here is to indicate the inventor's belief that returns maytell as much about the customer as the initial purchase.

Another alternate embodiment allows, not only the receipt of bills butalso their payment. Once the consumer has redirected billings to theDPS, the consumer must also arrange payment of bills through transfer ofconsumer's funds held at various banking institutions on consumer'srequest to do so, in effect a draft drawn on the individual bankinginstitution, by consumer's direction through the DPS 140. Uponpresentation to the customer, the customer has the opportunity to directpayment by means of any of several known Electronic Banking means, aknown practice that enhances the utility of the instant invention.Payment may be either to the DPS for payment to the individual vendorsor directly to the individual vendors. Wire transfers common in thebanking industry facilitate payment.

FIG. 4, a flowchart, describes customer enrollment in the DPS and theon-going refinement of the Customer Database information stored in theCustomer's name. At step 111, the customer initiates the processnecessary to enroll. This process may be a part of enrollment at a bank,or credit union, or it may be a stand-alone step. At this step 111, thecustomer not only gives a list of regular vendors to the DPS, but alsodirects the vendors on that list to send their bills, not to thecustomer but to the DPS. These data are compiled to create a record atStep 112.

Over time and as the system functions, the recording of varioustransactions and optionally, the customer's own response to questionsposed, refines this record. Optionally, the invention is the data withinthe system may augment the Customer Database, with data fromquestionnaires posed to the customer on a regular or occasional basis.After enrollment at step 113, the DPS examines the information garneredagainst its own standards for operable completeness. In the event thatthe information is either incomplete or contains apparently inconsistentinformation 114, the DPS will request and receive supplementalinformation from a third party, such as, for example, credit reportingagencies 115. In light of the additional information garnered, theinformation is again compiled and tested for completeness. If it isstill incomplete after all available supplemental third partyinformation has been received, the enrolling customer may be contactedfor clarification.

Once the customer is deemed acceptable, based upon the informationgarnered, the customer joins the population of the “closed market”defined as those customers in the DPS Customer Database. The DPSexamines each customer as member of this “closed market” for demographicinformation that will allow the DPS to conduct market segmentationstudy. If, for example, in the course of the analysis 116 of demographicdata, the Matching Engine determines a demographic factor forsegmentation of markets is necessary, and, it further determines, thatinformation with regard to that factor does not exist for a particularcustomer, the Matching Engine software will compose a question or seriesof questions or data queries to determine the existence or non-existenceof this factor for that customer. Upon receiving the response to thatquestion, the software will store the information as part of theCustomer Profile 117. Similarly, if the information is of a type that isbest garnered from third-party credit reporting services 50, the enginewill compose an inquiry and transmit the same 115. The responses will berecorded at 112.

At such time as the DPS receives information about a transaction 118, itwill record the same 119 by recording an association to a specific codeor series of codes in the Transaction Database 130. The specific meansof doing so is set out at FIG. 7.

FIG. 5 is a hypothetical bill to the customer, the contents of which isreceived at, or entered into, the DPS. Such bills are presentlypreferred source of transaction data for populating the DPS Databases,because, in accordance with the invention, added transaction dataassures the precision of the marketing efforts and for that reason, theinformation harvested from real bills, electronic or otherwise, isideal. Drawing from two bills to a hypothetical customer, May 350 andJune 360, the DPS will derive some facts about the bundling of servicesand about the customer.

Cable Television

For both the thirty-one days of May 351 and the thirty days of June 361,the bill from TCI is in the amount of $37.50. Thus, the system knowsthat the cable services are sold at a fixed monthly rate. Additionally,the price of the services, likely itemized would yield the precisenature of the product bundle.

Energy Consumption

Comparing the two months, the consumer paid $32.19 less to Puget SoundEnergy in June than in May 352, 362. Statistically, June is a warmermonth than May. Yet, the energy bill went down. A consumer living in thePacific Northwest will have drastically different power requirementsthan a similar consumer in the southeast, northeast, or the southwest.The customer's address pinpoints the climate for the DPS. Prevailingwarmer temperatures in June may cause the consumption of energy to godown over May.

Puget Sound Energy, in our example, happens to provide electricity aswell as natural gas. The distinction between a coarse analysis ofamounts paid and the finer analysis of line items is evident; thatdistinction underscores the importance of a line item analysis.

Satellite Communications

The consumer seems to have a fixed DirecTV (satellite television) bill353, 363.

Consumer Credit Cards

The consumer seems to be paying a revolving credit card off withDiscover Financial Services 354, 364. Each monthly payment is in theamount of $250.00. Generally, the amount due on a credit card would bereflective of purchases and unlikely to total in round figures.Evidently, the customer is using the credit card as a financing device.An opportunity exists for substituting a bank for the credit card asfinancing device. Hence, the analysis of credit card carrier as financecompany or vendor will allow the shopping for credit cards. Discover,like almost all credit card issuing companies, has various financialpackages that it presents to its consumers. In fact, each package hasseveral variables including introductory interest rate, regular interestrate, annual fee, grace period, etc.

A credit card company is both a vendor and, from the standpoint of theDPS, a messenger. On the itemized bill, transactions from numerousvendors would indicate the purchase of several products. Even theselection of vendors yields information as to the demographics andbuying patterns of the customer.

Insurance Payments

The consumer pays a fixed monthly insurance premium with State FarmInsurance 355, 365. The consumer makes a payment to an insurance companyof a fixed amount. It is essential to be able to review the line itemsin order to determine the bundle of coverage purchased.

Long Distance Telephone

The consumer seems to have made more long distance telephone calls withthe long distance provider 356, 366. This will be the exemplar for theindividual line item analysis. For such analysis we turn to FIG. 6.

This FIG. 6 contains the typical information found in a long distancetelephone bill. The level of detail found on this bill demonstrates thenature of product bundling by retailers. Some typical examples of thisbundling are evident in the several rates that exist; one such exampleis at 356.10, in contrast to either 356.20, or 356.30. Due to thedistinct times or zones in which the calls are made, the rates for eachcall are different. Nonetheless, the rules for determining the rates aredefinite and reproducible. At the DPS level, study of telephone callsfor an individual consumer or across the several consumers will quicklyyield a mapping of rates and conditions. Similar rate differences existfor international calls.

Also evident is regulatory bundling at 356.60 and 356.70. City 356.60,state, and federal taxes are generally reckoned on a percentage of callvolume basis. On the other hand, 911 fees 356.70 are generally chargedon a monthly rather than on a per volume basis. Thus, the total ofnon-service fees, 356.80, is complexly variable.

Acquiring data from the bills, in paper form, for analysis is presentlyaccomplished by the use of any of three current technologies depicted inFIG. 7: Manual Data Entry 119.21; Optical Character Recognition 119.22;or, “Screen Scraping 119.23. It is envisioned that as the inventiongains adherents, the various vendors will have a standardized means ofsending all such bills, either by specialized software 119.25 designedby the DPS or by means of Extensible Markup Language (XML) 119.24 anexisting standard for the interchange of such information. Additionaloptions became available via true electronic bill presentation andpayment. Until such time as the software means is generally available:

Manual Data Entry 119.21

Manual data entry is by far the most labor intensive, most prone toerrors, and least desirable. However, until automated informationinterchange mechanisms have 100% penetration, there will always be someneed for manually entering data. In effect, a data entry operator musttranslate all of an individual paper bill's contents into electronicdata and that data is, in turn, entered as the consumer's bill.

Optical Character Recognition 119.22

In this method a paper bill is entered into a scanning system. Anoptical character recognition (OCR) system will scan the page forpertinent transaction information from the vendor, then convert theinformation to machine readable form, and, then, automatically enter itas the consumer's bill. As with manual data entry, this system is lessthan desirable because bills can be mutilated, printing can be toolight, or other such defects that would cause the OCR system to produceincorrect results.

Screen Scraping 119.23

Modern electronic banking systems use CRT in character or graphicalpresentations. The DPS can simulate the actions of a consumer over acomputer network. Once the DPS has identified itself to an online bill(complete with details), a scanning system can be employed to lift theinformation off the screen—hence the term screen scraping. Like OCR,screen scraping is a little prone to error mostly because the onlinebill may change its form from time to time for aesthetic purposes, orsimply because information needs change.

On the vendor's billing cycle, a bill is sent by any of the means setforth above to the DPS. Either the vendor or the DPS will encode thebill, line item by line item into a standardized list of the constituentparts 119.30; standardized, that is, to reflect definitions contained inthe Transaction Database 130. Here is an essential step to ensuresufficient granularity of information. It is the object of thisstandardization to allow the bill to present a good or service in termsof basic units regardless of the identity of the vendor, so thataggregation and/or comparison access vendors is possible. Goods andservices are treated as fungible commodities under each definition inthe DPS's Transaction Database 119.40. Thus, for example, if a kilowatthour of electricity at a given time of day in a given season is assignedthe definitional designation of 1200 090 111 (much as inventory items ina store receive UPC coding), then, no matter the particular vendorsupplying the kilowatt hour, it is encoded on the bill as “n units of1200 090 111@ $2.11 per unit.” Precision in pricing, i.e. decimal placesdescribing the price, will extend as far as necessary to accurately ratethe good. Similar definitions work for all goods and services. Forexample, United States to Tokyo telephone services between hours of09:00 to 11:00 GMT for “m” seconds might bear a code 3600 313 007 @$0.099876 per unit. Any taxes or other charges are coded similarly asproducts and referenced with an association in the Vendors Databasemaking them part of a mandatory bundling. Similarly, if there is adividend or giveaway, that dividend is coded for its product identityand then bundled with the product under the rules in the vendordatabase.

In one embodiment, the DPS then re-assembles the bills in line item formand presents them to the consumer 119.50. These bills are descriptiveusing both the vendor's narrative description and the DPS coding of thebill. Similar coding and presentation is currently used in the medicalcommunity in response to the demands of the health insurance communityto describe various medical procedures and the provision of supplies. Anoperation will have a standardized code and a verbose name. Both arepresented on the bill to the consumer. In an alternate embodiment, thebills which are read by the system are not changed in the least, but arepresented to the customer or consumer as always. But, in thatembodiment, the data which appears on the bills is obtained from thebills or the vendor at any point after the transactions reflected in thebills occur.

Thus, simultaneous with the presentation of the bill to the consumer, orat any point after the actual underlying transactions occur, theconsumer's buying habits, as reflected by the bill, are compiled andentered in each of the three databases according to the nature of thedata. The transaction is sent to the Customer Database to describe,further, the customer's buying habits. Each of these sales is anchoredby the date of the transaction and because of the standardization of thedefinition of the transaction, a picture of the consumer as consumerbegins to emerge. That picture is stored on the consumer's individualfile in the Consumer Database 110.

The Vendor Database 120 contains associations that indicate the vendor'scurrent offerings. So, for example, if a rate plan for long distance isconsidered, the software will attempt to match the plan to a known plan.If the plan is not found, a new definition of a plan is entered. Soon,the billing plans at the DPS should perfectly mimic those at the vendor.

The Transaction Database 130 is continually being refined by theofferings by various vendors. If, for example, the consumer purchased anewly offered package of cable channels, that package may not, at thetime of purchase, be included in the Transaction Database 130. At eitherthe vendor's notification or upon the DPS's failure to find an adequatedefinition for the good or service, the DPS institutes a new designationfor the new service. In this manner, the database 130 is always up todate and comprehensive.

One principal advantage of the invention is to make the process ofpreparing and presenting offers to the customers efficient and tailoredto the needs and desires of the customers in the database. That abilityallows the vendors to forgo both marketing and advertising in thetraditional sense. Rather, an offering is tailored to particularcustomers in the database and transmitted in a targeted presentation tothose customers. By virtue of the customer's past buying habits, theoffers can be presented in a side-by-side comparison. The resultingefficiencies should appear in the form of lower costs of sales, and,thus, lower prices to consumers. FIG. 8 illustrates the workings of thisprocess. Importantly, these advantages are achieved without anyadditional effort on the consumer's part.

In FIG. 8, a vendor will place an offer in the Vendor Database 120 bycommunicating the same to the DPS. The event, placing the offer, willtrigger the Matching Engine 150 to begin its process of, first,categorizing and normalizing the offer, much as described above forbillings; second, assembling from the database a list of customers whocurrently, or who, by demographic study (as is further described in FIG.10), are likely to purchase the product. For each such customer, theMatching Engine analyzes the offer in light of the customer's prior useof it or of a similar product or in light of need for such productdemonstrated by demographics or the constellation of other purchasesstored in the Customer Database 110. Such analysis will further narrowthe likely customers for whom this offering is a “good deal.” After thewinnowing process, the DPS sends the “recommended” offer, along withreports of analysis as to annualized costs and comparative data, to theremaining designated customers. What the customer receives is likely avery attractive offer 160. This offer process is very likely to resultin a sale without advertising or marketing to create the exposure of theoffer to likely consumers. Again, the probability (that the offer willbe accepted) is higher because the data, upon which the sorting analysisis based, is data from actual transactions of the targeted consumers.Thus, the vendor/offeror can objectively demonstrate an objectiveimprovement over the consumers present expenditure.

The invention provides two-way matching. In the first application, theinvention allows customer “shopping.” In FIG. 9, the process for this“shopping” is set out. A customer signs on to a shopping screen,indicating his interest in making a purchase 151.00. In an interactiveinterview with the customer on the screen, the definition of the soughtproduct is narrowed by questions and the customer's answers thereto151.10. Once an operative definition of the sought product emerges, theDPS refers to its product definitions in the Transaction Database andchecks for a match 151.20. If no such product exists in the database, anexact definition of the specifications sought by the customer iscompiled from the product code 151.21. By virtue of the productdefinition, the DPS locates similar products 151.22. While these are, byStep 151.20, not complying products, the DPS presumes that the productscluster in the marketplace, i.e. that a vendor of similar products isthe most likely vendor of the sought product. The DPS frames the requestfor offer in “verbose” language and transmits the same to vendor withoutidentifying the customer 151.23. If the vendor does offer a complyingproduct or wishes to compose a complying offer, they forward that offerto the DPS both as an offer in the database 151.23 and a specific noticeto the DPS for forwarding to consumer with reference to the request151.24.

In the event that the product does exist in the database, all suchoffers are collected 151.30. Whether in response to the customer requestor whether it resided in the database, the several offers are compiledand annualized in light of the patterns established in the CustomerDatabase 151.40. The offers are ranked with regard to such parameters asthe customer has previously defined. In default of such parameters, theleast expensive product over the annual cycle will be the leading offer.The DPS will present the several offers to the customer for purchase151.60. If none of the offers interests the customer, the customer maychoose 151.61 either to abandon the search or to redefine the parametersof the search 151.61, and begin again.

If one of the selected products interests the customer, in alternateembodiments of the invention, the DPS determines if the product is aperiodic product, at step 151.70, such as insurance or telephonesservices, which is to say does the product actually represent a seriesof periodic purchases. Drawing on the information stored in the Customerdatabase, the DPS will enroll the customer for purchase of the newperiodic product, confirm the purchase and then cancel the customer'scurrent product at Step 151.90. The process produces both efficientprovision of product, i.e. no overlapping product, and completecoverage, i.e. no gap in coverage, especially for such products asinsurance or heating oil. The process is facilitated by the informationcontained in the Customer Database (See FIG. 12). Alternatively, aprocedure such as that described in Boesche, U.S. Pat. No. 6,092,053,can provide an alternate means of “automatic enrollment.”

In the case of non-periodic product, the customer simply places an order151.80. In either event, the system facilitates order placement for thecustomer as it does locating the conforming product.

In FIG. 10, the principal advantage to this “closed market” defined bythe Customer Database, is the vendor's ability to tailor their offers ofparticular products to the demographics of this market. Because so muchis known of the individual customers, the DPS can perform a statisticalanalysis and artificial intelligence to the process of marketsegmentation. Such segmentation study relates to the finding ofpotential customers for an optimized offer.

The object of this process is to break the market into segments 152.10defined by specific demographic factors (e.g. age, sex, income) and/orby preferences revealed by transaction data. Once a market segment isdefined, the product is tested for its appeal to that market segment152.20. Strictly defined, that appeal is judged in terms of purchasesrecorded in the Customer Database of similar goods. The more similar thegood, the higher the score. Other known statistical and analyticalmethods exist to refine this score. The inventive focus of this isinvention is to garner the data and present it to the DPS for study bythese known methods, but the statistical methods, themselves, are notclaimed.

Once the segments are scored for market penetration, those segments thatscore highly are grouped and examined for demographic factors common tomany segments 152.30. The study may be done in the negative as well,i.e. the factors common to the lowest scoring segments are determined tolikely be absent from the optimally configured segments. In eitherregard, the grouping of segments according to score and demographics isused to discern factors that define likely customers to purchase theproduct in question.

Even in light of a principal factor, secondary factors may also be ofinterest. The study iterates until all factors of interest are defined152.40. From the data thus collected, a list of factors should resultand compiling the same in terms of rank is a known process 152.50.Segments of the market are then optimized for a particular offer 152.60.The DPS determines a threshold score below which the offer is deemedirrelevant to a particular customer. The relevant customers are listedand ranked 152.80. The offer is then formulated as in FIG. 9 as thoughthe customer had been shopping for the same at Step 151.40, et seq. inStep 152.90.

Note that in some embodiments, the transaction or bill data can operateas the only source of data for market segmentation and offeroptimization. In other words, no information extrinsic to the presentedbills is necessary for the practice of the invention, and, in a certainsense, it is in this embodiment that the invention is the most powerful.For example, from a single bill and nothing more, the DPS can ascertainthe consumer, the transaction, and the terms of the transaction. Eventhis information can be sufficient to populate the DPS databases, andprovide the raw data necessary for the vendor, via the DPS, to segment amarket and optimize offers. The reason for this is that extrinsicdemographic information is fundamentally only an imperfect or crudeproxy for the actual preferences and likely purchases of a consumergroup, which can in many cases be more directly discerned with thisinvention.

For example, a high-end bicycle vendor wants to know who will buy amountain bike costing over $900. The vendor wants to know that becausethe vendor only wants to offer such bikes to such persons.Traditionally, because the vendor doesn't know who such persons are, thevendor learns by survey for example, that 75% of such bikes arepurchased by white, middle income males aged 25-45, so the vendor triesto target those persons, in the hope that some of them want to buy abike in that price range. Thus, the demographic information (white,middle income etc.), is merely a means to an end, with no independentsignificance. The end is who will buy those $900 bikes. Aside from whowill buy the bikes, the vendor doesn't really care about the traditionaldemographics. In contrast, this invention provides what in many caseswill be a more meaningful means to the same end; actual purchases. Forexample, by using the invention, the vendor will have access to personswho have in fact purchased mountain bikes, or at least bikes (dependingon the level of detail in the bills), costing over $900. The vendorwould not necessarily know, or care, whether the person was white, ormale, or old or young, or anything of the sort. All the vendor wouldreally care to know was that the person purchased a bike in that pricerange. In many cases, past purchases is a more reliable indicator offuture purchases than traditional demographic factors such as age, race,income, etc.

Note also, as mentioned above, that the invention is not restricted toanalyzing a single variable, but can correlate multiple variables,regardless of whether extrinsic demographic data is available. Thus, forexample, assume a vendor wants sell ski equipment. Traditionally, again,the vendor may target a certain demographic, which has demonstrated animperfect, but at least positive correlation to ski equipment purchases.However, with the present invention, the vendor might be able to easilypresent offers to only those consumers who, in the past 3 years, havenot only bought over $500 of ski equipment, but also either live inareas where it snows, or who have bought plane tickets to ski resorts,or who rent a ski chalet, or who are paying a mortgage on a cabin near aski area. All of that information can be gleaned solely from the billsthat are already being paid. Thus, again, merely from the bills andnothing else, substantially more accurate market segmentation andtargeting can be accomplished, and at much lower cost. Of course, theinvention can be practiced with any amount of additional extrinsic data,demographic or otherwise, but the point is that no extrinsic data isnecessary. In a sense, as far as vendors are concerned, consumers areprimarily defined by where, when and how they spend their money. Methodsof simple or complex artificial intelligence can be applied to furtheranalyze the spending patterns of particular consumers, and so drawincreasingly useful inferences. For example, it may be possible todeduce from a customer's health care expenses that they have recentlyhad a new child. New children typically trigger a reasonably predictablechain of expenses for years after. This in itself is useful marketintelligence. However, that information can be correlated againstseveral other kinds of expenses discerned from the bills to developextremely precise market segmentation and optimally targeted offers.

An additional refinement of the process is portrayed in FIG. 11. As inFIG. 10 the vendor conceives of a product for offering 153.10.Similarly, as well, the vendor must described that offer with termsdefined in the Transaction Database 153.20. In Step 153.30, the vendorreplicates the steps 152.10 through 152.80. When completed, rather thanto immediately offer the product to the customers, the DPS then, withthe predicted market penetration “costs out” the offer 153.40. Presumingthe predicted sales, standard methods of delivery and other relevantcontingencies, the vendor projects all of the costs of making the offer.Due to the efficiency of the “closed market” the vendor may findotherwise hidden economies, such as those of scale or production for aset run of product 153.50. Indeed, based upon those projections, thevendor can realize particular specificity in its contracts with thirdparty suppliers that may, itself, create economies in the offering.

Realizing these efficiencies, the vendor may choose 153.60 to presentthe offer as then currently constructed or, in search of greater marketshare, modify the offer to reflect these economies and test the newlyreconstructed offer 153.70. In either regard, after iteration, the offeris deemed optimized. Based upon the segmentation data gathered at Step153.30, the DPS selects likely purchasers from the Customer Database 110at Step 153.80. As in Step 152.90, the DPS presents the offer to likelycustomers 153.90.

FIG. 12, describes a two-sided process between the customer and DPS tooptimize the purchase of certain periodic products. In such a scenario,the customer indicates the preference for automated purchase of aparticular product. Through an interactive interview process, thecustomer's needs are ascertained, then coupled with the customer's ownprior use patterns, a qualifying offer is defined and mapped onto theCustomer Database 110 under the customer's identity 154.30. Along withthe definition are stored the customer's authorization to and rules forpurchase of the periodic product.

At Step 154.40 the Matching Engine 150 constructs bundles of servicesfrom the Transaction Database 130 and test them for pricing in theVendor Database 120. The resulting bundles are rated for compliance withthe customer's rules and if better than the customer's current periodicproduct offer, the Matching Engine sends an order to the vendors of theoptimal bundle 154.50. Once confirmed 154.55, the prior purchasing, ifany 154.60, is cancelled 154.70. The result should be optimal coverage.Once the rules are defined at Step 154.20, the purchase take placeentirely in the background with reports to the customer only uponrequest or upon change of vendors. Thus, the customer receives optimalpricing for coverage of periodic needs, without the requirement of priceshopping.

As this period product purchasing occurs, the vendor's own optimizing ofoffers should result in significant and regular changes in service inorder to capture the best prices. Likewise, the sellers gain greaterexposure for products without the otherwise required “front-end”advertising and marketing. Efficiencies realized by means of thisinvention should be mutually beneficial to vendors and customers.

While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated anddescribed, many changes can be made without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention isnot limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, theinvention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims thatfollow.

1. A method for facilitating electronic commerce between a multiplicityof customers and a multiplicity of vendors, comprising: a. creating acustomer database, comprising: i. enrolling a multiplicity of customersinto a closed market; ii. inputting a unique variable identifier to eachcustomer of the multiplicity of customers; and, iii. creating an initialrecord containing identity and demographic information for said eachcustomer of the multiplicity of customers; b. creating a transactiondatabase, comprising: i. creating a record corresponding to each productof a multiplicity of products; ii. identifying a sales unit quantityappropriate to the product; iii. inputting a unique variable identifierto the product; and iv. sorting and categorizing the products accordingto categories comprising function, use and composition; c. creating avendor database, comprising: i. creating a record corresponding to eachvendor of a multiplicity of vendors; ii. inputting a unique variableidentifier to said each vendor of the multiplicity of vendors; d.recording all purchases; comprising: i. identifying each customer whoeffected purchase of the purchases being recorded by each customer'sunique variable identifier stored in the customer database; ii.identifying the vendor, from the vendor database, from whom the customereffected the purchase by the vendor's unique variable identifier; iii.splitting each purchase into component line items; iv. determining thenumber of sales units purchased in each component line item; v.identifying each component line item by said component line item'sunique variable identifier inputted in the transaction database; vi.identifying a date for each purchase; and, vii. inputting a relationalinstance in the customer database, comprising: (A) the customer's uniquevariable identifier; (B) the line item's unique variable identifier,stored in the transaction database; (C) multiple of sales units; (D) thevendor's unique variable identifier, stored in the vendor database; and,(E) the date of purchase; e. receiving a vendor's offer to sell aproduct to the multiplicity of customers; f. sorting the demographicdata and purchase history for each customer and, in turn, sorting themultiplicity of the customers by a multiplicity of segments, eachsegment representing a group of one or more demographic characteristicsor purchases; g. calculating a statistical score representing marketpenetration of the vendor's offer for each segment of the multiplicityof segments based upon demographic characteristics and the purchasehistory; h. sorting the multiplicity of segments by statistical score,i. selecting a threshold score for likely customer acceptance of thevendor's offer; and, j. communicating the vendor's offer to thecustomers with the statistical score greater than the threshold score.2. The method for facilitating commerce in claim 1, further comprisingthe steps of: i. selecting a threshold score for likely customeracceptance of the vendor's offer; j. calculating profit the vendor islikely to realize; k. calculating the number of units sold the vendor islikely to realize by communicating the vendor's offer to customers witha statistical score greater than threshold score; l. calculating marketshare the vendor is likely to realize by communicating the vendor'soffer to customers with a statistical score greater than thresholdscore.
 3. The method for facilitating commerce in claim 2, furthercomprising the steps of: m. selecting values reflecting acceptableprofit, acceptable number of units sold and acceptable market share thevendor will realize from the vendor's offer; n. adjusting terms of thevendor's offer in light of the profit, number of units sold, and marketshare; o. repeating steps e through h, and k through n until the profit,number of units sold and the market share most closely meet the selectedvalues.